UK Bribery Act

News Week in Review, March 24, 2014

NXLevel Compliance Team , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

GSK plans to hire physician speakers as employees, the Arkansas Supreme Court reverses the Risperdal verdict, SciClone sets money aside for an FCPA settlement, and Canada strengthens its Food and Drug Act.

Are your brackets ruined? You’re not alone. They don’t call it March Madness for nothing! Take heart though, most NCAA fans are in the same boat, and that one billion dollars from Warren Buffet for a perfect bracket can still be yours…next year. As you work through the carnage of your tournament picks, we offer the solace of a week’s worth of compliance news, with this week’s News in Review.

Outside physician speakers have suddenly been delegated to the bench at GSK. The company announced it plans to hire physicians and scientists to conduct product-focused educational programs rather than pay external speakers. Bringing the speakers in house should lighten the company’s Sunshine Act reporting load, but some experts question whether the move is worth the risk of having the speakers’ credibility and qualifications questioned.

Upon video review, the ruling in the courtroom has been overturned. The Arkansas Supreme Court has reversed the $1.2 billion Risperdal verdict against J&J and Ortho-McNeil-Janssen. The companies were sued and ultimately fined for violations of the state’s Medicaid Fraud False Claims Act (MFFCA) and Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA). In an appeal, the companies argued appeal that the court erred when it ruled on the MFFCA and DTPA claims. The justices agreed on the MFFCA since the law is written to apply to a healthcare facility and not a pharmaceutical company and a majority of them agreed that the DTPA fines were not warranted.

No cash, no foul? A recent ruling in a case involving GSK and Teva seems to suggest so. A U.S. District Court judge ruled that since a settlement between the two companies did not involve a cash payout, the arrangement did not violate antitrust laws. As part of the settlement, GSK agreed to allow Teva to sell a chewable form of one of its drugs prior to the patent expiring while agreeing not to sell its own authorized generic of the drug. The Federal Trade Commission had argued that those types of arrangements have their own value.

SciClone is keeping some key resources on the bench and ready to be utilized when needed. The company announced it is reserving $2 million for penalties related to an ongoing FCPA investigation. In its annual report, the company said a settlement was probable.

A full-court press to strengthen Canada’s Food and Drug Act is in effect. The Canadian Parliament will debate a bill that would give the country greater ability to regulate drugs even after they are approved. The bill will give the Health Minister the power to recall unsafe products and require changes to labels.

If you thought NCAA rules were confusing, try figuring out the international physician spend transparency requirements. At the recent Disclosure Summit, an expert discussed the EFPIA’s Code of Disclosure on Transfers of Value from Pharmaceutical Companies to Healthcare Professionals and Healthcare Organizations (hence forth know as the Code). The EFPIA Code must be integrated into its member organizations’ code by the end of the year. That’s 33 different organizations! Further complicating the situation for the manufacturer are conflicts between the Code and existing laws in countries like France and Portugal. EFPIA is expected to release more guidance on addressing these conflicts at the end of March.

As the final buzzer sounds on this week’s Review, we offer a reminder that the PharmaCertify™ suite of customizable off-the-shelf eLearning modules and mobile apps provide the touch point learning opportunities your reps need to stay up-to-date with the latest commercial compliance information and good promotional practices.

Have a great week everyone!

News Week in Review, March 4, 2014

NXLevel Compliance Team , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The FDA updates its good reprint practices guidance, ACCME modifies the accreditation process, one attorney feels the abundance of qui tam cases are slowing the system, and the Solicitor General offers a suggestion to the Supreme Court on a qui tam case.

Laissez les bons temps rouler everyone! It’s the last day of the Carnival season and Mardi Gras is upon us. This is a crazy time of year in the Big Easy for sure, but even if you can’t make it to Bourbon Street, you just need to grab yourself some King Cake, organize an office krewe, and let the good times roll. As you contemplate all of the thematic possibilities for your floats, we’ll kick off our celebration of the week in compliance with this week’s News in Review.

Extravagant designs may work when designing Mardi Gras masques, but not so much for CME accreditation rules. The ACCME’s board of directors has adopted changes to simplify the accreditation process and requirements. Changes include a simplification of the process for first-time applications and the removal of some of the accreditation criteria and policy requirements. The changes apply to all CME providers in the ACCME accreditation system, and are effective immediately.

According to one expert, there are way too many attendees lining up for the qui tam ball. Peter Hutt, a defense lawyer in False Claims cases, points out that nearly 75 percent of cases brought by qui tam plaintiffs don’t result in government intervention or a recovery for the U.S. Treasury. According to Hutt, the cases are a drag on the system and he believes there should be changes to the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act. Qui tam litigation should be a second line of defense in fighting fraud, says Hutt, and he would like to see incentives in place for companies to self-disclose fraudulent activity.

The U.S. Solicitor General is suggesting that the U.S. Supreme Court not review a qui tam case involving Takeda. The case raises the question of whether a relator has to provide specific instances of false claims in order to meet satisfy rule 9(b) of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure. Although the circuit courts are split on the case, the Solicitor General believes the split among the circuit courts is not as pronounced as it initially appeared, and as the law evolves, the courts may resolve the issue.

Merck has good reason to celebrate this week. In a securities filing, the company noted the DOJ has closed its FCPA investigation of the company, and no action will be taken.

Any celebrating at the  French train manufacturer, Alstom, will have to wait. The company is expected to face charges of violating the U.K. Bribery Act. The charges are the result of a five year investigation. In 2010, the Serious Fraud Office raided the Alstom offices and the homes of several executives in the U.K., who were arrested under suspicion of paying bribes to win foreign contracts.

The FDA updated its good reprint practices guidance to address the topic of “distributing scientific and medical publications on unapproved new uses.” In the section referencing scientific or medical reference texts, the agency offers guidance on two fronts; providing chapters from a text and providing an entire textbook. Overall, the guidance for medical reference texts and CPGs are largely the same as medical journals.

That about does it for this week’s parade of compliance news. We wish you a joyous Fat Tuesday, and we look forward to bringing you all the compliance news you need to know right back her next week.

Thanks for reading and have a great week!

Week in Review, February 17, 2014

NXLevel Compliance Team , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

A look back at 2013 FCPA enforcement reveals trends for the future, Brazil enacts an anti-bribery law of its own, at least one attorney wonders if Sunshine will hamper qui tam cases, and the FDA wants medical device adverse event reports submitted electronically.

Well, it’s President’s Day – certainly, one of the more interesting American holidays in terms of its evolution. From what we’re told by the folks at the history channel, the holiday was originally created to celebrate George Washington’s birthday. The shift to “President’s Day” is somewhat convoluted but suffice to say, it was part of the Uniform Monday Holiday, which was passed in 1971 and was intended to create more three day weekends for the nation’s workers, while fighting employee absenteeism by ensuring that holidays fell on the same weekday. Whew! Now that we are all clear on that, let’s focus on something a lot easier to understand, the compliance news of the week, in the News in Review.

Speaking of history, we begin this week with a look back at the DOJ’s enforcement of the FCPA for clues to future trends. Not surprisingly, the scope of FCPA enforcement widened in 2013, and the average cost of resolving increased to $80 million last year. New industries felt the brunt of the Act, with apparel manufacturer, Ralph Lauren, and ATM manufacturer, Diebold, entering into settlements with the government to settle charges. The agencies also expanded their investigatory search beyond written documents to business communication in general, with one representative of a mining company being charged with witness tampering based on a secretly recorded conversation.

A new bribery law  had its inauguration at the end of January. Brazil’s Clean Companies Act went into effect on January 29th. The law allows for the prosecution of  acts of bribery committed by Brazilian companies or foreign companies with a registered affiliate in Brazil. Unlike the FCPA and UK Bribery Act, the Clean Companies Act only carries civil penalties.

Holiday or not, Teva may not be a celebratory mood. The company announced it was under investigation by the government for the marketing practices related to two of its drugs. The government requested documents dating back to 2006 as it conducts the investigation.

From the land adjacent to the “land of Lincoln” comes an announcement of a program designed to educate medical students about the inner workings of the pharmaceutical industry. Eli Lilly is rolling out a four week rotational program where students will experience the various aspects of the drug development process and how physicians contribute to that process. The program will be conducted at Tulane University’s School of Medicine.

On the legal front, during a National Disclosure Summit, a qui tam attorney said Sunshine data could hamper qui tam cases more than it could help. The attorney said relators will have a harder time getting past the False Claims Act “public disclosure bar,” which requires relators to file their claims before information is in the public domain. On the other hand, the Sunshine data will add instant credibility to  a whistleblower’s claims, according to the same attorney. The data can also support an “inference of off-label marketing.”

The FDA announced that beginning in August of 2015, adverse event reports related to medical devices will need to be submitted electronically. The move, which is part of an initiative to improve operations, is expected to save the FDA $1.9 million each year. Companies will save too, but only after an estimated $38 – $42 million dollar investment to upgrade their own systems and procedures.

And so ends this week’s News in Review. With the end of another February in site, now is the time to launch updated product promotion training for 2014. The customizable PharmaCertify™ eLearning module, Good Promotional Practices offers the training your field staff needs on critical topics like gifts, meals and entertainment; advisory boards; and speaker programs.

Have a great week everyone!

 

The 2014 Pharmaceutical Compliance Congress: A Recap and Review

NXLevel Compliance Team , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The 2014 Pharmaceutical Compliance Congress featured many of the same speakers and topics as past conferences, but recent developments in the world of anti-bribery and compliance brought a new twist to the presentations.

Last year’s developments related to the Chinese government’s aggressive pursuit of corruptions was a recurring topic, with John Crisan, Chief Compliance Officer for Johnson & Johnson, stating at the start of the first session, “what happened in China is a major game changer,” and in a later session, Gary Giampetruzzi from Pfizer said, “The fact that China has put people to death for corruption-related offenses certainly gives pause for concern.”

After the opening remarks of Day 1, Tom Abrams from the Office of Prescription Drug Promotion at the FDA took the stage. Of course, Abrams’ presentation this year had the added bonus of the recently announced news regarding the agency’s guidance on social media. Before providing detail on the guidance, particularly in regard to the process for submitting promoting websites, he emphasized that the agency has more work to do in regard to social media and it “will continue to be a high priority.”   Abrams also told the audience that overall, the quality of promotional materials seems to be improving and the agency is very encouraged at the level of voluntary compliance by the industry.

Carmen Ortiz, US Attorney for the District of Massachusetts, followed with a keynote address regarding the trends in healthcare that have followed major settlements with pharmaceutical companies. Ortiz told the audience that there have been no shortage of qui tam referrals and “the publicity around the cases helps her office reach other whistleblowers and bring more issues to light.” She included the establishment of what she called “ethical compensation plans for reps” and on-going training (a topic close to our hearts and minds here at NXLevel Solutions) in her list of critical best practices for life sciences companies.

Anita Griner, from the CMS Center for Program Integrity followed with a review of the ever popular Open Payments program, a.k.a. the Sunshine Act. Griner offered a thorough review of what data needs to be reported under Sunshine and the process for submitting those reports. Her review included the three reporting categories: General Payments, Research Payments and Ownership and Investment Interests, as well as examples of both Direct and Indirect Payments. Griner’s presentation was comprehensive and she suggested anyone with questions contact the agency’s help desk at openpayments@cms.hhs.gov or sign up for the updates at http://go.cms.gov/openpayments.

The US Healthcare Fraud Enforcement Panel was next, with representatives from US attorney’s offices around the country. Ben Singer, from the Department of Justice, highlighted the focus on the healthcare industry by stating that the DOJ has 38 prosecutors fully dedicated to healthcare fraud prosecution.  Zane Memeger, from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, discussed the cooperative nature of their work, saying the larger offices share resources with the smaller offices in order to boost their efforts throughout the country. Memeger stressed the critical behavior his office looks for when considering the settlements for violators. Key on his list is whether a company trains its employees regularly, since the rules change regularly, and whether the company self-discloses a violation. Bill Nettles, from South Carolina, agreed, saying he and his colleagues discuss whether each case was self-reported when they review. Of course, when the panel was asked whether they ever decided to not prosecute a case because the disclosure was voluntary, the members smiled and said no.

A panel of defense attorneys closed the morning with suggestions for mitigating risks and preparing for the future. Jennifer Romanski from Porzio reminded the audience that while compliance has to have authority, they have to have buy-in from the entire organization. “You can’t have compliance doing everything,” Romanski stated, “businesses need to play a role.” David Resnicoff of Miller & Chevalier focused on clinical research programs and the need for companies to focus on “what the conversations with the federal government will look sound like, even as they are building their compliance programs.”

For the early afternoon session, I selected the Product Promotional Compliance Track, which kicked off with Lessons Learned from Recent Enforcement Actions Related to Digital Marketing and Social Media. David Vance of Noven offered a comprehensive review of FDA’s position on Internet promotion, and emphasized the need for diligent self-regulation by the industry. During her presentation on Compliant Social Interactions and Engagement, Jennifer Chillas from Bristol-Myers Squibb made a point that those in the industry should not be telling their vendors about the compliance rules, the vendors should be telling them. Do your training vendors know the rules? We do.

During a lively question and answer session, Vance, Sheetal Patel from Johnson & Johnson, and Chillas delved into the challenges of “liking” pages on Facebook.  They agreed that the key is to be aware of what you are “liking” and be careful not to “like” off-label discussions or scientific discussions on sites such as Medscape.

To gain more of a perspective on the global front, I chose the 2:40 session titled FCPA – Key Insights and Enforcement Trends, during which Gary Giampetruzzi from Pfizer made the comment regarding China that I quoted earlier. Giampetruzzi was joined by Richard Konzelmann from Daiichi Sankyo, and the two presented what I considered to be one of the most informative and compelling sessions of the entire conference. After presenting an array of statistics and polls showing that a significant driver of business growth over the next three years will be customers outside the US, the two speakers made a case for the need for increased diligence over interactions, starting with more auditing and investigatory work. Giampetruzzi said he expects FCPA enforcement to accelerate even more quickly, with the 2013 institution of the whistleblower provision in the Dodd-Frank Act. Properly trained management is key to creating an environment in which employees feel comfortable discussing issues internally and feel their concerns are addressed without the need for outside reporting.

I closed Day 1 with the Effective Crisis Management Panel, which featured an impressive list of attorneys and consultants from King & Spalding and more. Wick Sollers, who not long ago represented Joe Paterno at Penn State, pointed out that due to the nature of its business, the pharmaceutical industry is one of the most crisis prone and the need for training on how to respond to a crisis is critical. Seth Lundy agreed, saying “too many of our clients are surprised when someone from the government shows up at the door.” The panel agreed that the Sunshine Act is a risk, particularly with the release of the data scheduled for September and their concern that companies are too focused on the details of the process instead of what the data will reveal.

Day 2

Day 2 started early and the FCPA was once again in focus, as Kathleen Hamann of the law firm, White & Case, again looked at the Act and reminded the bleary-eyed audience to not make their diligence just about the FCPA, but more about eliminating bribery worldwide.

Ilisa B.G. Bernstein, Deputy Director of the Office of Compliance at the FDA, covered the top oversight priorities for the agency. Bernstein focused on the manufacturing problems that occurred because so many facilities were old and out-of-date. But the FDA is encouraged to see the industry policing the problem itself, with firms building new plants, creating better methods and production redundancy.

As the second cup of coffee started to have its desired effect, Patrik Florencio and Samuele Butera, both of Sandoz, and Erik Ramanathan, of Harvard Law School, delivered their Making Compliance Part of Management 101 presentation, which was met with favorable comments throughout the rest of the day. The focus of their comments drilled down to “how often does your manager clearly and specifically reinforce that compliance must never be compromised in order to hit targets?” The three presenters offered a fresh take on the concept of a “culture of compliance” by presenting concrete examples of how internal communication, focused on sales targets, can be seamlessly enhanced with core compliance principles. Compliance targets and goals should not just be theoretical but should be intertwined with financial goals.

The Chief Compliance Officer Panel included the CCOs from AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Aegerion, and Sunovion. Following an introduction by the moderator, which ran a little too long for a number of attendees I later spoke to, the panel also discussed the rules-based vs. values-based approach to compliance. Balance seems to be the key, with Sarah Whipple from Aegerion noting that in “our business, you can’t get away from a rules-based approach. People are used to rules, but people need to be rewarded for doing the right thing.” Jeff Fleming from AstraZeneca pointed out that his company is evolving from a rules-based approach to a values-based one, which does present challenges. “If you’re not going to have rules, tremendous accountability is required,” said Fleming. Matthew D’Ambrosio from Sunovion touched on the handling of mistakes, “Mistakes can be addressed with training, except of course for catastrophic mistakes.” he said. The panelists also agreed that communications and effective awareness campaigns are critical.

The Compliance Program Structure and Effectiveness track was my next stop. Representatives from large and small pharma companies presented suggestions on topics from the challenges of multinational compliance programs to the importance of business in compliance decisions. Jessica Kwon of Forest Laboratories talked about the need to be aware of what is going on in a specific country, politically and culturally, when establishing a compliance program there. “That helps move the conversation along,” Kwon said, “bring yourself out of a US focus.”

Christine Fiore and Bob Doyle of Boehringer-Ingelheim centered their presentation on integrating the business into compliance and it proved to be one of the most dynamic sessions of the day. The pair explained how the compliance department at BI is made up of professionals from different backgrounds who bring a valuable range of experience to the table. Fiore stressed the need to make compliance training fun and engaging and shared tools and tips for doing so with the audience. She even demonstrated an internally-developed iPad app that features video clips and policy documents in a creative and organized framework. This was great material and certainly cutting-edge in terms of how critical compliance content is delivered.

For final session of the conference, I chose the discussion on Compliance Considerations for Small to Mid-Sized Companies, mostly because so many of my clients fit this description and I’m always looking for more knowledge to share with them. The session didn’t disappoint. The discussion began with the topic of resources and whether the participants utilize others, outside of compliance, to accomplish their objectives. “You have to,” said David Stollman from Incyte, “but you have to ask permission to do so. Don’t set yourself up for failure.” Jeff Rosenbaum from Vertex said he turns to his colleagues in accounting for help with auditing. He also pointed out that for small companies with a global presence, compliance can be difficult and again, a focus on the biggest areas of risk is necessary.

On the subject of budgets, the panel agreed that decisions have to be made on what is really needed and what is wanted. How much of that can be done in-house? A good risk assessment will lead to the budget and that assessment needs to be the first step. For Elizabeth Jobes from Auxilum, prioritization is critical. “The highest risk has to be addressed first.”

The session closed with a word of warning from a number of the panelist – no matter how limited your resources, don’t conduct investigations alone. One-on-one meetings in those situations present too many opportunities for facts to be recorded improperly and distorted later.

The 2014 Pharmaceutical Compliance Congress, along with PCF’s Pharmaceutical Regulatory and Compliance Congress both offer excellent opportunities for industry professionals to stay abreast of the best practices and strategies needed in a complex and evolving regulatory world. As a vendor partner, the conferences provide me the chance to not only network with clients and colleagues, but also distribute critical ideas through my social outlets, such as this blog.

If you attended the 2014 PCC, I welcome your comments and feedback. Thanks for reading!

Sean Murphy, NXLevel Solutions

Week in Review, February 4, 2014

NXLevel Compliance Team , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Industry teams with HCPs to formulate a framework for ethical collaboration, medical device companies are advised to keep their compliance programs robust, and pharmaceutical companies disagree on the Sunshine Act as it relates to support for medical writing.

How about that Super Bowl Sunday! No doubt there were cheers, laughs and maybe even a few tears shed as you and your friends gathered to watch the best of the best compete. Of course, we’re talking about this year’s Super Bowl commercials! And, yes, there was a football game played (sort of) in between those delightful bits of entertainment. The array of commercials included some that were memorable and humorous (that bizarrely fun Audi “Doberhuahua” spot) and many that we found downright confusing (Axe “Kiss for Peace?”). While it might not be as memorable as that Radio Shack spot, we like to think that this week’s News in Review is a production worthy of your time and attention.

Huddle up! A group representing the pharmaceutical industry, healthcare providers and patient advocacy organizations recently published a framework for ethical collaboration. The framework is designed to foster collaborations that further patient care, and it is supported by four ethical principles: put patient’s first; support ethical research; ensure independence and ethical conduct; and promote transparency and accountability. The group says regular information sharing and communication between patients, practitioners and the industry is vital to improving health and advancing medical knowledge.

Biotech and small medical device companies need to be sure they stay aggressive on offense when addressing FCPA compliance. Since biotech and medical device products often require additional approvals that increase the level of interaction with government officials, the risk of FCPA violations also increase. With life sciences companies in the cross-hairs of enforcement agencies, companies need to make sure their compliance programs are robust and comprehensive.

Share clinical trial results you will. Janssen announced it will share some of its clinical trial data through the Yale School of Medicine’s Open Data Access Project (otherwise known as YODA). YODA will serve as the vetting agent for clinical trial data requests from researchers and physicians. Some requests for the data will still be handled by Janssen R&D directly.

A federal judge is allowing a whistleblower case against Abbott to continue. A former sales rep filed the suit, alleging the company paid kickbacks and promoted its drug TriCor for off-label uses. Abbott moved to dismiss the case because the whistleblower failed to provide specific evidence of a false claim being submitted. The judge rejected those allegations.

Pharma companies are not reading the signals from the Sunshine Act the same when it comes to medical writing support. During the International Society for Medical Publication Professionals’ European meeting, representatives from several pharmaceutical companies revealed how their companies were handling medical writing support provided to authors of clinical studies, and not all companies agreed that there was any real transfer of value to physicians. AstraZeneca and Pfizer representatives said there was value to the author. Shire, on the other hand, saw the only value was to the company, and there was no need to report medical writing support. The Shire representative said they were collecting the information in case it ultimately has to be reported, but that the company was confident in its approach.

And with that, the clock has run out on this week’s News in Review. If you attended last week’s Pharmaceutical Compliance Congress, you heard industry peers and government regulators emphasize the need for an up-to-date compliance program that extends training beyond the check-the-box approach. The PharmaCertify™ suite of off-the-shelf compliance solutions offers the eLearning modules and mobile apps you need to extend critical compliance policies to where your team needs it most – in the field and at their fingertips.

Have a great week everyone!

Week in Review, January 28, 2014

NXLevel Compliance Team , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sunshine and state-accredited CME are clarified at a conference, the Supreme Court weighs in on medical device patent infringement, China institutes a new program to monitor healthcare and a new study shows the industry is still wary of social media.

Go west, young man…if you want to escape this arctic cold that is. It was another week of super cold weather, snow showing up in unlikely locales (you saw all the memes about Austin, TX, right?), frozen pipes and below zero wind chills. When Anchorage, Alaska is warmer than Atlanta, GA, you know we’re having cold weather here in the east. To make matters worse, another blast of arctic cold is on the way. The only escape seems to be the western part of the country, where temperatures in the 80’s and sunshine are thriving. The rest of us will just have to huddle around the fireplace and catch up on all things compliance, with this week’s News in Review.

The topic of Sunshine and state-accredited CME programs heated things up at a recent continuing education conference. A CMS representative speaking at the conference mistakenly indicated that state accredited CME programs were not exempt under Sunshine. The final rule actually refers to both certified and accredited CME and does not draw any clear lines between the two distinctions. After hearing how the process actually works, the CMS representative realized that the state-accredited CME would qualify for exemption.

The U.S. Supreme Court iced out patent holders in a recent decision. The Court unanimously ruled that patent holders bear the burden of proof in patent infringement cases, even if they received a declaratory judgment. The case at the center of the ruling involved Medtronic and Mirowski Family Ventures,LLC. Mirowski holds patents for implantable heart stimulators, and Medtronic had a license agreement to use those patents. The company claimed Medtronic infringed its patents, but a federal court ruled Mirowski  had not met the burden of proving infringement. The case was appealed and a U.S. Court of Appeals reversed the ruling, saying Mirowski set the events in motion and that there was “no convincing reason why burden of proof law should favor the patentee.”

The FDA has discovered a new way to submit nominations for its advisory committees. The agency announced the launch of an interactive online portal for the submission of advisory committee nominations. Applicants can submit their entire application through the new portal. The FDA says the system will eliminate confusion and accelerate timelines for submission and acceptance.

China is cranking up the thermostat with a campaign to deal with bad manufacturing and marketing practices in healthcare. The inter-departmental campaign involves eight different departments in the Chinese government. Officials hope to also use the program to deepen reform efforts in medical services.

A new report shows much of the industry still feels chilly about social media. The report from IMS Health indicated that 23 of the top 50 companies worldwide are using Facebook, Twitter and YouTube. However, only 10 of the companies are using all three, and very few are using social media to engage patients. Most are using social media as a way to deliver messages intended for providers and patients alike. Companies with a small therapeutic focus tend to use social media more to engage the patient. In an interesting twist, the study also found that regulators are quite active on social media. The FDA and EMA post high index reach scores, and the FDA scored higher than any pharmaceutical company on IMS’ relationship scale.

We certainly hope everyone stays warm and safe as the next arctic express heads east. We’ll be venturing out into it ourselves for CBI’S 11th Annual Pharmaceutical Compliance Congress. If you’re there, stop by our booth in the exhibit hall to say  hi and see a demo of our new Compliance Curriculum Refresher Training series.

Stay warm everyone!

Week in Review, January 14, 2014

NXLevel Compliance Team , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The University of Minnesota adds a medical device degree to its curriculum, Microsoft requires its partners to take anti-corruption training, Aegerion receives a subpoena from the Department of Justice and CMS clarifies its stance on textbooks and journal reprints under Sunshine.

If you weren’t watching television Sunday, you missed a night of glittering stars, flowing wine and cutting one-liners. Even with Meryl Streep pronouncing awards season as ridiculous, millions tuned into the Golden Globes to see if their favorite movie, TV show, or actor took home the trophy. Okay…let’s face it, some of us watch just to marvel at the ridiculousness of the fashion choices, which is often far more interesting than the acceptance speeches (with the exception this year of Jacqueline Bisset’s confused rambling – what was that!?). We have winners and losers of our own (of the compliance kind) to cover in this week’s News Week in Review.

The University of Minnesota plans to award individuals a medical device master’s degree in the near future. The University is currently recruiting students for a master’s level program in medical device innovation. The program will be part of the school’s College of Science and Engineering and the first class is expected to be enrolled this June.

The question at Microsoft isn’t “who are you wearing?” it’s “who has taken anti-corruption training?” The company launched a global initiative requiring all its partners to provide anti-corruption training to “all employees who resell, distribute, or market Microsoft products or services.” Media reports claim the DOJ and SEC are investigating allegations of bribery involving Microsoft partners in several countries.

In a settlement that almost rivals the value of the jewels on the stars walking the red carpet Sunday night, Alcoa has agreed to pay $348 million to settle charges it violated the FCPA. The settlement is a joint effort between the SEC and DOJ. SEC officials said Alcoa subsidiaries repeatedly bribed officials in Bahrain and Alba in order to obtain government contracts. The company agreed to plead guilty to one count of violating the FCPA.

Here’s one envelope you don’t want to see your name on: a DOJ subpoena. Aegerion confirms it has received a subpoena from the DOJ for information related to the sale and marketing of its cholesterol drug, Juxtapid. The company’s CEO recently received a warning letter for misleading statements he made about the drug during a television interview. Aegerion says it is fully cooperating with the investigation.

As far as two clinical research professionals are concerned, the Sunshine Act should be nominated for the “Law Having the Most Negative Impact on Clinical Research” award. Gary A. Shangold, M.D., chairman of the Association of Clinical Research Professionals Board of Trustees, and Michael J. Koren, M.D., former president of the Academy of Physicians in Clinical Research, authored an article outlining how the Sunshine Act will negatively impact clinical research and medical innovation. They are concerned that the reports on payments related to research are not reflective of what the physicians are actually paid; the cost of complying with the law will divert money from research; and overall quality of care will ultimately be affected by the diminished investment in research. The two also call on lawmakers to change the legislation in order to provide a more accurate picture of the financial transactions between research physicians and the industry.

CMS Administrator Marilyn Tavenner recently responded to an inquiry from Congress about textbooks and journal reprints not being considered educational items under the Sunshine Act. Educational items are described as those that are intended for patient use or have a direct benefit for the patient and are therefore excluded from reporting. In her letter, Ms. Tavenner said textbooks or journal reprints do not have a direct benefit for patients the way an anatomical model does. Rather, the textbooks and reprints provide a “downstream benefit” for patients so CMS believes the items should be reported as gifts or education.

With that, the band is signaling us that it’s time to wrap up the News in Review for this week, so we’ll leave you with one last note. If you’re looking for additions to your 2014 compliance training cast, PharmaCertify™ offers up-to-date modules and apps on critical topics like Adverse Events, On-label Promotion and Good Promotional Practices.

Have a great week everyone!

Week in Review, January 7, 2014

NXLevel Compliance Team , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Industry associations implement new principles on clinical study data, Abbott settles a False Claims case, the SEC suggests that the FCPA could cover commercial bribery, and the FDA wants to know if its messages are being heard on social media.

Welcome to a new year of compliance news! As the calendar turns, our thoughts turn to the yearly rite of passage otherwise known as New Years’ resolutions. Whether your goals are personal in nature (eat right, save more money, exercise more, etc.) or more focused on your professional life, we wish you the best of luck and as we say in the training field, we hope it sticks! At the Compliance News in Review, we resolve to keep you updated every week on the news from the world of life sciences compliance. With that, we welcome you to the inaugural 2014 edition of the News Week in Review.

The  European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) and PhRMA are starting the year by changing how clinical trial study data is handled. The joint principles on clinical trial data created by the two organizations in 2013 went into effect January 1 and the new principles provide healthcare professionals, qualified researchers and others with the ability to request patient-level data, study-level data, and full clinical study reports and protocols. Some member companies, like GSK and Pfizer, have already provided directions on how to request the data.

Transparency International wants businesses to resolve not to make facilitation payments. In the latest version of the organization’s Business Principles for Countering Bribery, provision of facilitation payments is now considered bribery. Other changes to the principles include the addition of a section addressing conflicts of interest and the addition of a section on the need to complete a business-specific risk assessment when developing an anti-bribery policy.

Abbott is starting the year $5.475 million lighter following a settlement with the DOJ over charges the company violated the False Claims Act. The government alleged Abbott paid doctors to implant several of the company’s vascular products into patients. The suit was originally filed by two former Abbott employees who will receive over one million dollars of the settlement.

The commitment hasn’t quite risen to the level of a resolution yet, but the SEC seems to be indicating it may expand how it enforces the FCPA. At a recent conference, FCPA Unit Chief Kara Brockmeyer told participants that the books and records provision of the Act makes the prosecution of corporate bribery fair game. If corporate bribery is discovered during the course of an investigation, a company’s books and records will be scrutinized and action can be brought against the company.

China is starting 2014 with a renewed focused on bribery involving pharmaceutical, medical device and nutritional products companies. The country is planning to blacklist companies that pay bribes to doctors or healthcare authorities. The first offense will result in a regional ban, and the second in a full country ban.

The FDA is taking new steps to make sure its messages are being heard. The agency will monitor online chatter to see if its social media messages are reaching an audience and if that audience is paying attention.

That’s all for this week folks. Remember, if you’re 2014 compliance training curriculum could use a refresher, the PharmaCertify™ suite of off-the-shelf modules and mobile apps bring up-to-date compliance content on topics like the Sunshine Act and on-label promotion to your staff where they need it most – in the field and at their fingertips.

Have a great week and Happy New Year!

Week in Review, Holiday Edition

NXLevel Compliance Team , , , , , , , , , , ,

With the holidays approaching, one co-pay charity falls onto the “not so nice” list, whistleblowers get the gift of protection against retaliation, and the state of Maryland finds an extra present of its own.

Well, here we are in the final stretches of the Christmas shopping season and either you’re resting peacefully, content in the knowledge that your mad dashes through mall mania are behind you, or you’re in full “take whatever is left on the shelf” panic mode. As you unwind with a cup of eggnog and a slice of recycled fruitcake, we offer a compliance-themed distraction of our own, with this edition of the News Week in Review.

Tis the season for giving, but at least one charity needs to be careful about the process. The Chronic Disease Fund (C.D.F), which provides co-pay assistance to patients with chronic conditions, has come under scrutiny for its relationship with pharmaceutical industry donors. Questions were raised in investor publications about the relationship between the charity and pharmaceutical manufacturers. C.D.F. has hired a law firm to review its practices and recommend new policies to comply with legal requirements. The organization’s president/founder has resigned.

In the spirit of the season, the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee wants to give whistleblowers the gift of protection against retaliation. The Committee approved the Criminal Antitrust Anti-Retaliation Act of 2013 to protect whistleblowers involved in antitrust cases. The bill will allow for recourse against retaliation through a cause of action in civil court, through which compensatory damages would be possible. The bill has been sent to the House for approval.

Maryland is getting a little extra in its stocking this year since GSK has agreed to a $15 million settlement with the state over accusations the company improperly marketed three diabetes drugs. The suit was filed under Maryland’s False Health Claims Act. The company allegedly touted the drugs as being superior to competitive products, without justification, and allegedly neglected to share information about the heart disease risks associated with the drugs.

Speaking of GSK, the company announced it will no longer pay doctors to promote its drugs, and it will no longer pay for physicians to attend medical conferences. According to CEO Andrew Witty, the moves have nothing to do with the current investigation into the company’s business practices in China, but are rather an ongoing effort to “stay in step with how the world is changing.” The plans should be rolled out globally by 2016. The company also announced that starting in 2015 it will no longer compensate sales representatives based on the number of prescriptions written by doctors on a global basis. The revised compensation policy is already in place in the U.S.

The head of the Canadian Medical Association is among those caroling the approval of the move by GSK. The CMA president said it was a welcome change, and should serve as a “wake up call” for those who are too “cozy” with the industry. He said the CMA has had rules regarding relationships with industry companies for some time, and that he hopes the move by GSK will promote a larger transparency discussion in Canada.

With the final shopping hours ticking away, we won’t keep you from your appointed rounds (or from your happy dance if you happen to be in the “woo hoo I’m all done” category) any longer. We leave you with a reminder that if comprehensive compliance training on topics like on-label promotion, adverse events and the Sunshine Act are still on your own gift list, the modules and mobile apps available through the PharmaCertify™ suite of solutions offer  up-to-date and customizable content where your staff needs it most – in the field and at their fingertips.

Have a great holiday everyone!

Week in Review, December 16, 2013

NXLevel Compliance Team , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Serious Fraud Office hits another bump in the road, Brazil expands its anti-corruption efforts, and the Pew Charitable Trusts and the CME Coalition disagree on suggested changes for the industry’s interaction with medical schools.

As the song goes, “the weather outside is frightful.” The string of winter storms over the last week has brought snow for some, ice for others, and a lovely cold rain over much of the country. Welcome to early winter! Yes, we know, the calendar still says we’re in the fall. If you’re one of the unfortunate ones scraping snow and ice off your windshields and sidewalks already, we can’t offer much in the way of help with that shovel, but we can help you catch up on the compliance news you need to know, with this week’s News in Review.

The Serious Fraud Office is facing more stormy weather. The agency abruptly called off the high-profile bribery case against businessman Victor Dahdaleh. Dahdaleh was accused of paying millions in bribes to managers at Aluminum Bahrain (Alba) over a period of eight years.  The trial began in early November, and the SFO had to call an end to their prosecution when two U.S. lawyers who had helped with case refused to testify and a third witness changed his testimony. The two U.S. lawyers also represent Alba in a civil case, which raises questions about whether they should be used in the British criminal case. The case is the latest in a string of embarrassing and expensive missteps for the SFO.

New legislation has been introduced in Canada that would require doctors and pharmaceutical companies to reveal more information about the adverse effects associated with pharmaceutical products. The law would require doctors to notify Health Canada when patients have an adverse drug experience, and pharmaceutical companies would then be required to make immediate changes to a drug’s label to reflect the new safety concerns.

A change in the anti-corruption weather is on the horizon in Brazil. The Clean Companies Act (CCA) will go in effect January 29, 2014. The anti-bribery law shares a number of similarities with the FCPA and U.K. Bribery Act. The law applies to any company or legal entity doing business in Brazil, and applies to the bribery of both domestic and foreign government officials at any level. It also prohibits facilitation payments and implements strict liability for legal entities involved in corruption.

The courtroom had to be frosty when Boehringer Ingelheim was handed a $931,000 fine for losing documents related its Praxada drug. The judge said the company allowed the documents to be destroyed, and that attempts to create back up versions were even thwarted. Further, the company disabled programs that would have preserved voicemail and text messages. The loss of the documents affects 1,700 patient lawsuits.

A report from the Pew Charitable Trusts suggests industry-physician interactions at the nation’s medical schools need to be put in the deep freeze. The recommendations from Pew include the typical ban on rep visits, meals, gifts, etc., as well as a suggestion that school staff not accept speaking fees from pharmaceutical companies.

The CME Coalition would like to put the Pew recommendations on ice though. Senior advisor to the CME Coalition, Adam Rosenberg, says the recommendations in the report are “irresponsible,” and “they are nothing short of dangerous to America’s health.” For example, even though Pew recommends that CME should be free of industry funding, the organization cites no studies or evidence showing that funding is leading to poor patient outcomes, or is unduly influencing prescribing decisions.

And so we come to the end of this chilly edition of the News Week in Review. If adverse events reporting is at the top of your holiday and new year wish list, the newest off-the-shelf module from PharmaCertify™, Adverse Events and Product Complaints, covers the definitions and sources of events and complaints, as well as the information needed to ensure accurate reports are filed. As with all of the PharmaCertify™ solutions, the module is easily customized with your  organization’s procedures and policies.

Stay warm everyone, and have a great week!